McChrystal Seeks Over 60,000 More Troops for Afghanistan

Posted: 9 October 2009 by Little Alex in Af-Pak War, Political Science
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A U.S. official familiar with Gen. McChrystal’s confidential troop request submitted to the White House confirms that it exceeds 60,000.

[picapp src=”1/e/9/a/General_McChrystal_Travels_adb8.jpg?adImageId=5002358&imageId=6742005″ width=”234″ height=”156″ /]

President Barack Obama’s top commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, submitted an official request for more troops in Afghanistan at the end of September after submitting a report to the Pentagon August 30 that not committing more troops—on top of the Administration’s doubling of troops in 2009—risks “mission failure. The August report was ‘leaked’ late last month.

ABC News reported that Gen. McChrystal’s official request—expected to be deliberated by the Administration today—exceeds 60,000 more troops to add to the 68,000 U.S. troops of the 100,000+ International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) troops set to be present at the end of this year. The Wall Street Journal and FOX News report “a U.S. official familiar with the document” confirms the report. (h/t: Jason Ditz)

Jason Ditz, AntiWar.com news editor, writes: “The news comes as quite a surprise, as previously the general had been reported to be calling for an additional 45,000 troops, but had also said that 40,000 more troops was the absolute minimum needed.”

This detail should not come as a surprise as msnbc’s Andrea Mitchell reported that military sources have said that: redacted in the August report is the assessment that 500,000 “boots on the ground” are needed between ISAF and Afghan forces. Relaying that report September 27, I wrote—citing Julian Barnes and Mark Magnier at the Los Angeles Times:

The number floating around over the last week has been that of 40,000 troops requested to be added to the ISAF in 2010. That number is being mistaken for Gen. McChrystal’s formal request. The number—40,000-–is what “Kimberly and Fred Kagan, defense analysts who helped McChrystal prepare his assessment of the war” are estimating are needed “to pursue counterinsurgency strategy”

Analyzing Gen. McChrystal’s assessment, I concluded in that post: an absolute minimum of 200,000 troops were needed by the U.S.-led ISAF coalition for the commander’s near-term counterinsurgency strategy. Adding 60,000 more U.S. troops in 2010 would put the ISAF presence at over 165,000—128,000 of whom would be U.S. troops, around the current U.S. troop presence in Iraq.

RELATED RECENT POSTS:

Comments
  1. […] 68,000 will be in Afghanistan and 120,000 in Iraq. The Obama Administration is considering sending over 60,000 more troops to Afghanistan in 2010 for a full-scale counterinsurgency operation with no endgame–doomed by […]

  2. […] General Stanley McChrystal, top ISAF commander, has reportedly requested over 60,000 more U.S. troops in the near-term. Military sources have said 500,000 ‘boots on […]

  3. […] a counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan, the U.S. and its allies would need to commit at least another 100,000 troops to begin building an Afghan Security of 400,000. This assessment was made by us before military […]

  4. […] a COIN strategy in Afghanistan, the U.S. and its allies would have needed to commit at least another 100,000 troops to begin building an Afghan Security Force of 400,000. This assessment was made by us before […]

  5. […] McChrystal Seeks Over 60,000 More Troops for Afghanistan […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s